The 71 first-time donors nobody ever called + why the next nine weeks decide who stays


Hi Reader,

A development director friend told me about a list she printed last spring and couldn't stop looking at.

Kara runs fundraising for an adult literacy program in Spokane. In April she pulled every donor who had given for the first time the previous November and December. There were 71 of them. Then she pulled how many had given again since.

Nine.

She started reading down the list and found a man named Paul Bergin who gave $250 on December 2. She went into the database and traced every piece of mail and email he'd received after that. A tax receipt on December 2. The spring newsletter in March. The next appeal in November.

That was it. Eleven months, three touches, two of them asks.

Paul didn't leave angry. He never found out whether his $250 did anything. By the time Kara's name showed up in his inbox again, he'd forgotten he'd ever given.

She told me the hardest part wasn't the nine. It was realizing those 71 people showed up during the six weeks of the year when she had the least attention to give them, which is exactly when she'd asked them to come.

YOUR FUNDRAISING CERTIFICATION

You already know how to do this work. Now you can prove it. The Certified Nonprofit Fundraising Professional (CNFP), Certified Nonprofit Digital Marketer (CNDM), and Certified Nonprofit AI Fundraiser (CNAF) are exam-based credentials created by practitioners for practitioners. No ten years of paperwork. No thousands of dollars. Each one comes with a verification page to demonstrate your achievement.

➔ Subscribers get 20% off any of them with the code SUBSCRIBERS200.

​See the certifications​


THE MAIN POINT

Giving Tuesday is six weeks out. Between now and the end of the year, you'll bring in more first-time donors than in the rest of your calendar combined. And you'll be worse at taking care of them than at any other point in the year, because you'll be in the middle of the campaign that recruited them.

That's the trap. Acquisition and stewardship peak at the same time, and stewardship always loses.

Here's what makes it worse. A first gift isn't a decision to support you. It's a test. The donor is finding out what happens next. If the answer is a receipt and then silence, they've learned that you're a transaction, and the next appeal you send lands on someone who has already quietly filed you away.

The window where that's still up for grabs is roughly the first 30-90 days. Not because it's magic, but because that's about how long you stay recognizable to someone who gave once. After that you're a logo.

So build the welcome series now, in October, while you still have a spare hour. Not in December. In December you will not have an hour.

Day one or two: a thank-you that isn't a receipt. The receipt is an accounting document. It is not gratitude, and donors can tell the difference instantly. Within 48 hours, a human should say thank you with no ask attached. A two-minute call. A five-line email signed by an actual person with an actual name. A card. For gifts over whatever threshold you can sustain, a call from a board member works better than anything you'll write.

Say what they gave, say thank you, and stop. Don't attach a newsletter signup. Don't mention the campaign. One message, one purpose.

Day seven to ten: tell them what their specific gift does. Not your mission statement. Not a history of the organization. The thing their money buys. "Your $250 covers a tutor and a student meeting once a week for a full semester." That's it. That sentence is what turns a donation into a decision they feel good about.

Most welcome emails describe the organization. Donors already decided they like you. What they don't know is what they just did.

Day 14: proof it happened. This is the step everyone skips, and it's the one that separates you from every other nonprofit they gave to in December. Send one piece of evidence that the work is real. A photo. Three sentences from a program staffer. A single number from the month. No ask anywhere in it.

The message underneath is: you gave, we did the thing, here it is. That's the whole point of the first 30 days. Close the loop.

Day 21: give them something. Give them an ebook, a video, a digital premium of some kind. This helps remind them of the value of giving to your organization and sets a feeling of reciprocity with the donor.

The message underneath is: you gave, we did the thing, here it is. That's the whole point of the first 30 days. Close the loop.

Day 30: the second ask, built on the first gift. Now you can ask, and you can ask well, because you have something to point back to. "In October, your gift put a tutor in a room with someone learning to read their kids' school letters. We're doing it again this December." The second gift is the one that converts a one-time donor into a donor, and it's much easier to get when it's a continuation of a story rather than the start of a new pitch.

Make it run without you. This is the part that determines whether any of it survives December. If the 30-day sequence depends on you remembering, it will die in the first week of the campaign, which is precisely when you need it most.

Write the five messages now. Put them in your email platform as an automation triggered by a first gift, or if your system can't do that, put a standing 20-minute block on your calendar every Monday through February to work the previous week's new donors by hand. Either works. What doesn't work is intending to.

And keep the list. Tag every first-time donor from this fall as a cohort. In April, do what Kara did and count how many gave again. That number is the only honest scorecard for a year-end campaign, and almost nobody looks at it.

Learn more about keeping the donors you already have:


One Last Thing...

Nine out of 71.

What gets me about Kara's list is that nothing went wrong. No one made a mistake. Every system worked the way it was set up to work. The receipts went out on time. The newsletter mailed. The appeal hit in November like it was supposed to.

Paul Bergin gave $250 to a literacy program because something about it mattered to him, and then he waited to find out if he'd done any good, and nobody ever told him. He's not a retention problem. He's a guy who got no answer.

Kara built the four messages in August this year. She told me the one that surprised her was day thirty, the proof. She sent the first batch to summer donors, no ask in it at all, and got eleven replies. One of them was a woman who wrote back to say she hadn't realized the program was still running, and could she volunteer.

You're about to meet a lot of new people. Decide this week what the next 30 days will feel like for them, because in six weeks you won't have the room to decide anything.

See you next week,

Jeremy Reis


P.S. Pull every donor whose first gift came in during November or December of last year. Count how many gave again. Whatever that number is, it's the real result of your last year-end campaign, and it'll tell you in about ten minutes whether building the 30-day welcome is worth your October.

NonprofitFundraising.com

Imagine becoming the go-to fundraising expert on your development team. Imagine creating a new revenue stream for your nonprofit – tapping into digital, major, midlevel, monthly and other donors to find new supporters, help the inevitable transition from direct mail to digital fundraising, and take advantage of new techniques to drive increased donations. We help YOU raise more money to help more people.

Read more from NonprofitFundraising.com

Hi Reader, A donor once emailed us upset. He wanted to give $1,000 toward a well. He wanted to know exactly where his money would go, and he wanted to name the well. Our organization wasn't set up that way. Gifts for clean water went into a fund that supported well projects, but we couldn't trace one donor's dollars to a specific well in a specific community. We also didn't offer naming rights for a $1,000 gift. The email exchange got worse. Someone on the donor-care team suggested we let him...

Hi Reader, When I arrived at Serving Orphans Worldwide, the board met twice a year and wasn't getting regular updates. We moved the meetings to four a year, and I started a monthly board impact report. My team wasn't thrilled at first. Each report has a letter from me, photos, a story, ministry highlights, prayer requests, and financials. It also has social media posts board members can copy if they want to share. We build them in Canva. Board members email back that they love hearing from...

Hi Reader, When I arrived at Serving Orphans Worldwide, the organization sent four fundraising appeals a year. The one mailed appeal went out at year-end, and the staff stuffed and stamped every envelope by hand around a table. The board wanted to grow beyond the churches and major donors that had funded the ministry so far. So we changed the rhythm: four emails a month (not all of them fundraising), a mailed appeal every month, and two mid-major proposals a year. We didn't add anyone to the...